Who has to repair leaks affecting some owners in a shared garage association?

 

June 17, 2020
Mancomunidad garajes - Who Repairs Leaks in a Shared Garage?

We have been asked, in the case of a shared garage association (mancomunidad de garajes) set up for garages shared by two homeowners’ associations, where water ingress has been found affecting several parking spaces and storage rooms belonging to one particular homeowners’ association, who should be liable for this damage: one homeowners’ association, the other, or the shared garage association.

 

The homeowners’ association’s maintenance obligation.

First, we should remember that article 10.1 of the Horizontal Property Act (LPH) 49/1960 of 21 July, in paragraph a), establishes that the work and building works necessary for proper maintenance are compulsory, as is compliance with the duty to preserve the property and its communal services and installations, including in all cases those needed to meet the basic requirements of safety, habitability and universal accessibility.

 

In this respect, case law has held that, where leaks or flooding result from the poor upkeep of the building and its installations (even if shared with other buildings), particularly when the owner has drawn attention to that poor condition, article 1907 of the Civil Code applies (Supreme Court judgments of 20 April 1993 and, more recently, of 1 July 2000), and the homeowners’ association is only released from liability where the negligent involvement of a third party is proven and nothing can be held against the association’s conduct, or where its conduct played no causal role (Supreme Court judgment of 19 December 2006).

In other words, the homeowners’ association of the affected owners must indeed be responsible for maintaining and repairing the source of the leaks, without prejudice to the right of recourse or to claiming, where appropriate, against the shared garage association, the water utility concession holder or whoever it may be.

In addition, in the case in question, an “ad hoc” easement had clearly been created over the use of the garage and the contribution to its costs up to a certain physical limit (up to the two doors giving access to the storage rooms and to the exit of each building, which is precisely where the leak had occurred), so what was agreed in the easement will prevail over everything else.

If you have any questions, contact us.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Responsable » DPCON RECLAMACIONES JUDICIALES SL
Finalidad » Prestación de servicios requeridos
Legitimación » tu consentimiento
Destinatarios » No se cederán datos a terceros.
Derechos » Tiene derecho de acceso, rectificación y supresión

Related articles

DON’T HESITATE TO CONSULT US!

CUSTOM BUDGETS

7 + 1 =

GDPR-LSSI

The information you submit will be added to a file owned by DPCON RECLAMACIONES JUDICIALES S.L. It will be used solely to process your data and handle your request, in compliance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR), Organic Law 3/2018 (LOPDGDD) and Royal Decree 1720/2007. Your data will not be shared with third parties except when legally required, and will be retained until you request deletion.
You may exercise your rights of access, rectification, erasure, portability, restriction, objection and withdrawal of consent at any time by writing to dpcon@dpcon.es.

Contact

Telephones: 911 61 01 65 / 646 567 732

Email: dpcon@dpcon.es

Headquarters: Paseo de la Castellana 257, 1º Sur
CP 28046, Madrid

SERVICE ALL OVER SPAIN

WhatsApp